Vultage
Vultage does not replace your scanners. It makes sense of all of them at once.
The alternative
Tenable, Qualys and Rapid7. Each of them asks you to standardise on its scanner and retire the others.
At a glance
- Input
- Exported results from the common automated scanners, and manual penetration test findings
- Modules
- Unified vulnerability management, scan automation, scanner reports, risk prioritisation, asset scoring, vulnerability intelligence, attack surface detection, incident management
- Workflow
- Ticket integration, rule based alarms, enriched reports
- Integrations
- Full API
The others ask you to replace your scanners. Vultage reads the ones you already own.
Organisations do not standardise, whatever the licensing model assumes. One scanner covers the network, another covers web applications, another covers cloud, another covers containers. Each produces its own report, none of them knows the others exist, and the same vulnerability appears three times under three names with three severities.
Vultage is the layer above the scanners rather than another scanner. Results exported from the common tools are read into one pool, duplicates collapse, and what is left is ranked by asset score rather than by whichever severity field the scanner happened to write. Thousands of findings are not a work queue. A ranked list is.
Manual penetration test results go into the same pool, and that is the part most teams do not expect. The annual test arrives as a document, gets tracked in a spreadsheet, and lives outside the process that fixes everything else. Read into the same queue, a tester's finding is ranked next to a scanner's and closed the same way. Nothing has to be retired for any of this to start, which changes the shape of the decision. Replacing a scanner means writing off an investment and retraining a team. Reading all of them in one console does not.
How it works
- Results from different scanners are read into one pool
- Penetration test findings are read into the same pool
- Duplicate records collapse into one
- Prioritisation combines asset score with risk rather than severity alone
- Findings become tickets in the system the team already uses
- Remediation is tracked through to close
Who it is for
- Organisations running more than one scanning tool and managing each separately
- Security teams where the finding count stopped being actionable
- Teams whose penetration test results live outside the remediation process
- Buyers protecting an investment they have already made
Where it sits
Exposure and vulnerability, though not doing what the other products in that area do. Vultage does not scan anything. It sits above the scanning an organisation already runs and turns several tools' separate reports into one ranked queue that can be assigned and closed. Comparing it against a scanner is comparing two different layers, and that is the most common mistake made when this category is evaluated.